Media personality Pearl Thusi has found herself at the centre of intense public debate following a tribute she delivered at the memorial service of her late friend and former co-host, DJ Warras. What was meant to be a heartfelt celebration of a deep, long-standing friendship quickly became one of the most talked-about moments of the service, with many social media users criticising her choice of words and the story she chose to share.
DJ Warras, a respected radio and television figure best known for his work on *Live AMP*, was tragically gunned down on Tuesday, 16 December 2025, in Johannesburg. His sudden and violent death sent shockwaves through the entertainment industry, prompting an outpouring of grief from fans, colleagues, and close friends. On Friday, 19 December, loved ones gathered to honour his life, legacy, and impact on South African media.
Taking to the podium, Pearl Thusi reflected on her years of working alongside Warras, describing their bond as one rooted in trust, loyalty, and a sibling-like connection. She spoke warmly about their shared experiences, from hosting major events to navigating the pressures of the entertainment industry together. However, her tribute took an unexpected turn when she recounted a personal anecdote that left many viewers uncomfortable.
Pearl recalled a time when she and Warras were booked to host a Castle Lite event together. According to her, Warras was anxious about missing his flight the next morning and insisted that they share a hotel room to ensure he woke up on time. She admitted that she was initially reluctant, worrying about public perception, but said Warras dismissed her concerns and suggested they simply “cuddle,” framing it as harmless and rooted in their close friendship.
While Pearl intended the story to highlight Warras’ carefree nature and their platonic bond, the anecdote quickly overshadowed the rest of her speech. Those present at the memorial reportedly laughed, interpreting the story as light-hearted and affectionate. Online, however, the reaction was far less forgiving.
https://x.com/i/status/2001975086689992917
Social media users accused Pearl of being insensitive and failing to “read the room,” especially given the solemn nature of the occasion and the presence of Warras’ family, including his children. Many felt the story was inappropriate for a memorial service and should have remained a private memory rather than a public tribute.
Comments ranged from expressions of second-hand embarrassment to outright condemnation, with critics arguing that the anecdote detracted from the dignity of the event. Others questioned why such a personal story was shared at all, suggesting it shifted focus away from honouring Warras’ life and achievements.
Despite the backlash, some supporters defended Pearl, noting that grief manifests differently for everyone and that her intention was clearly to celebrate a meaningful friendship. They argued that memorials often include personal stories and moments of levity, and that her speech should be viewed through that lens.
The controversy has once again highlighted the scrutiny public figures face, even in moments of mourning. As investigations into DJ Warras’ murder continue, the focus for many remains on remembering his contribution to South African entertainment and the profound loss felt by those who knew and loved him.
About the Author
