The ongoing drama surrounding Sne and her 24-year-old boyfriend, Andile, has taken another dramatic turn as new claims from neighbours have surfaced, further fuelling intense debate on social media. What initially gained attention after a now-viral Instagram Live session by Sne has e
volved into a complex situation, with conflicting accounts leaving the public divided over who is truly at fault.
According to neighbours who say they live close to the couple, video clips have been shared with popular Facebook influencer Mandisi, allegedly showing that Sne may not be entirely innocent in the ongoing dispute. These neighbours claim that the events leading up to the viral Instagram Live were far more explosive than what was first presented online.
Neighbours allege that on the day of the incident, Andile contacted Sne and asked her to come and collect her belongings. However, when Sne arrived at the property, she reportedly found Andile in the company of one of his three baby mamas. This discovery is said to have angered Sne, who, according to the neighbours’ version of events, reacted aggressively.
They claim that Sne allegedly broke Andile’s windows, burned his clothes, and later set his car alight during the confrontation. The situation reportedly escalated further when Andile’s friends attempted to intervene and calm things down. Neighbours allege that Sne physically attacked one of his friends who was trying to help defuse the situation.
These allegations, shared through video clips and statements sent to Mandisi, have added a new layer to a case that has already gripped social media users across the country. Many people who initially sided with Sne after her emotional Instagram Live have now been left questioning what truly happened behind closed doors.
However, the neighbours’ claims have not gone unchallenged. A growing number of women have come forward on social media, strongly disputing the neighbours’ version of events. These supporters argue that Sne is being unfairly portrayed as the villain and insist that she is a victim rather than an aggressor.
Some women allege that the neighbours themselves may be responsible for the damaged property, including the broken windows and burned clothing, and are now shifting blame onto Sne to protect Andile. They argue that Sne has been subjected to emotional distress and public scrutiny while Andile’s actions are being overlooked.
As the story continues to unfold, the public remains sharply divided. With conflicting narratives from neighbours and Sne’s supporters, many are calling for verified facts and official statements to clarify what truly transpired. For now, the Sne vs Andile saga remains a reminder of how quickly social media can amplify personal disputes and how difficult it can be to separate truth from speculation in highly emotional cases.
Until authorities or credible investigations provide clarity, the situation remains unresolved, with both sides standing firmly by their version of events.
About the Author
